Category Archives: Uncategorized

Norrie: sex not specified

When a baby is born the first question people usually ask is, “Is it a boy or a girl?” Yet many babies are not so easily classified. Some babies have genitals that have both male and female features. Others may appear to be girls only to discover as teenagers that the reason that they are not menstruating is because the have testicles instead of ovaries. Similarly apparent boys may have ovaries and there are others who have a mixture of both.

Some people’s brains do not match their bodies; there are numerous accounts of children and adults who feel this way. Although the American Psychiatric Association (APA) labels these people with the diagnosis of Gender Identity Disorder (GID), it is the only “mental disorder” that is treated medically (with hormones and surgery) instead of with psychiatric medications. And evidence continues to mount that the brains of these individuals are both structurally and functionally similar to the brains of the gender they claim to be. In Westernized countries we label these people “transsexual” or “transgender”. Other cultures make room for a third sex and use other labels: “Hijra” (India), “Fa’afafine” (Polynesia), “Kathoeys” (Thailand) and “Two-Spirit” (Native American Tribes) are well-known examples.

In the distant past rigid gender roles may have been useful to delineate the expectations and responsibilities of individuals and to maintain order within their collective communities. On the other hand these gendered roles also created power differentials that have been used to disempower, subjugate and abuse women for millenia.

The roles of women in American society have undergone radical changes. During WWII, a shortage of male factory workers gave women an opportunity to leave the home and made Rosie the Riveter a cultural icon. When the men returned from war women were encouraged to return to the home by the promotion of the idealized homemaker exemplified by June Cleaver of the TV show “Leave It to Beaver”. While many women did return home many did not. Given that women continue to make less money than men for similar work and that they remain outnumbered in leadership roles today it is clear that inequality of the sexes is alive and well in modern society.

But what about all the individuals who do not neatly fit into these cultural boxes? A video interview with Norrie of Sidney, Australia by abc NEWS shows that Norrie is one such person who defies definitions and prefers the box “sex not specified”. The interview subtly suggests that if gender is really a continuum then perhaps we should reconsider the purpose that gender identification serves and consider its worth in context of the inequality that it propagates.

New FDA dietary guidelines

The FDA has released its new recommendations entitled: Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. Healthy living begins with healthy eating.

  • Enjoy your food, but eat less.
  • Avoid oversized portions.
  • Make half your plate fruits and vegetables.
  • Switch to fat-free or low-fat (1%) milk.
  • Compare sodium in foods like soup, bread, and frozen meals – and choose the foods with lower numbers.
  • Drink water instead of sugary drinks.

Related post: MyPlate – the USDA’s new food groups symbol (6/3/11)

U.S. hospital visitation discrimination is over!

Obama’s Hospital Visitation Presidential Memorandum goes into effect today. No longer will hospitals that participate in Medicare and Medicaid programs be permitted to discriminate against LQBTQI patients and separate them from their loved ones.

 VIDEO: Lesbian’s death helped inspire Obama’s new visitation rule for same sex couples.

Are you REALLY SURE you want your OB/GYN to cut your little boy?

Circumcision remains highly marketed at the hospital I mentioned in an earlier post. Although there were at least 3 of us who did not want to perform circumcisions at the beginning of my residency, I remain the only one who has stood my ground. Many residents do not want to do them but do not have a “moral objection” and thus feel they must so as to not shift their work onto other residents. New medical students rotating through labor and delivery are expected to ask new mom’s if they want their sons to be circumcised and to chart it in their notes. There is no discussion about the controversial nature of this procedure nor the option stated that they have the right to opt out. Medical students in particular are less likely to rock the boat because they know that their grade depends on it. It is quite frustrating to me to see how resistant people are to change and how easily people cave-in to peer pressure.

I am especially frustrated that OB/GYN residents and providers continue to feel that they are competent to perform the procedure.The tradition of OB/GYN physicians performing male infant circumcisions began many years ago when they used to deliver babies in the homes of their patients and was born out of convenience; after delivering the baby it seemed appropriate to go ahead and perform the desired circumcision as well. Nowadays the vast majority of deliveries by OB/GYN physicians occur in the hospital with pediatricians and other specialists readily available so convenience is no longer an valid argument. Moreover, OB/GYN residents in general receive scant education in the anatomy and pathophysiology of the penis. Those that choose to perform circumcisions are essentially performing the “simple” procedure without the associated medical knowledge required of all other surgical procedures. And unlike other surgical procedures, the postoperative follow-up and management of complications are performed by pediatricians and other specialists instead of the OB/GYNs who performed them.

A recent article by Dr Brian Le, MD found that while the majority of 27 respondent obstetric-gynecology residents “planned to perform neonatal circumcision when in practice, 44% had no formal training in circumcision and most were comfortable performing routine neonatal circumcision. Overall respondents were less comfortable evaluating whether the a newborn penis could undergo circumcision safely. When presented with 10 pictures of penises and asked to determine whether the neonate should undergo circumcision, 0% of respondents correctly identified all contraindications to neonatal circumcision with an average of 42% of contraindications identified correctly.” (Le B. Mickelson J. Gossett D. Kim D. Stoltz RS. York S. Sharma V. Maizels M. Residency training in neonatal circumcision: a pilot study and needs assessment. Journal of Urology. 184(4 Suppl):1754-7, 2010 Oct.)

I recently performed a Medline Ovid search (looking for primary literature) and found that while there are over 50,000 articles in OB/GYN’s two most respected journals — Obstetrics & Gynecology (aka the Green Journal) and the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology (aka the Gray Journal) — only 43 of these articles address male circumcision. Thus OB/GYN physicians write only 1.1% of the articles relating to male circumcision and represent only 0.076% of the articles they produce. Finally, the American Congress of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (ACOG) continues to reject exhibition of circumcision dissident materials by Intact America at their national conferences because ethical consequences of this procedure are apparently “beyond the scope of the practice of obstetrics and gynecology.”

In summary, while  OB/GYN physicians have a long tradition of performing male infant circumcision and many continue to be more than happy to take a whack at infant penises, there is mounting evidence that they are deficient in the medical knowledge required to do so safely, they are uninterested in learning how to improve their skills and they do not contribute to respected literature to perfect techniques. Are you REALLY SURE you want your OB/GYN to cut your little boy?

Related posts

Doctor and hospital sued for circumcision

Doctors may think that parental consent is all they need to surgically modify the genitals of infant boys but they can still be held liable for malpractice when those little boys grow up. Leave our penises alone and end circumcision now!

Related posts

It gets better!

I can’t say it any better than Joel Burns: “It gets better.” You may be afraid but you are never alone. If you need someone to talk to please call The Trevor Project at: 866-4-U-TREVOR (866.488.7386)

Related posts

Happy Pride Month and Lawrence v. Texas Day!

On June 26, 2003, the U.S. Supreme court invalidated state sodomy laws in the landmark case, Lawrence v. Texas. With this ruling, it was no longer possible to minimize the “gay lifestyle” as an illegal one. Justice Scalia dissented, “Today’s opinion is the product of a Court… that has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda… It is clear from this that the Court has taken sides in the culture war…”

Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case. In the 6-3 ruling, the justices struck down the criminal prohibition of homosexual sodomy in Texas. The court had previously addressed the same issue in 1986 in Bowers v. Hardwick, but had upheld the challenged Georgia statute, not finding a constitutional protection of sexual privacy.

“Lawrence explicitly overruled Bowers, holding that it had viewed the liberty interest too narrowly. The majority held that intimate consensual sexual conduct was part of the liberty protected by substantive due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. Lawrence has the effect of invalidating similar laws throughout the United States that purport to criminalize homosexual activity between consenting adults acting in private. It may also invalidate laws against heterosexual sodomy based solely on morality concerns.

“The case attracted much public attention, and a large number of amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs were filed. Its outcome was celebrated by gay rights advocates, who hoped that further legal advances might result as a consequence. Conversely, it was lamented by social conservatives.”

Stop H8, Support Love protest 4/17

The University of Saint Thomas is inviting Maggie Gallagher, President of the anti-gay National Organization for Marriage (NOM), and Bishop Salvatore Cordileone, one of the creators of California’s Proposition 8, to its campus on 4/17 to bring their campaign of discrimination to Minnesota.

Join Minnesotans in saying “No!” OutFront Minnesota, All God’s Children MCC, the Univ. of St. Thomas Allies, the Univ. of St. Thomas Law School OUT!Law, the Catholic Pastoral Committee on Sexual Minorities, and the Institute for Welcoming Resources (a project of The Task Force) will be out in force to protest Proposition 8 and the discrimination NOM has been fighting for across the country. Wake up early and take part!

Details: Stop H8 – Support Love
Saturday, April 17, 2010
8:30am – 10:00am
University of Saint Thomas
Summit Ave & Cleveland Ave N
Saint Paul, MN

Fraudulent Representation of Medical Opinion by Fundie Quacks

Tom Benton, MD and his flock of other quacks (American College of Pediatricians) have stooped to a new low in their attempt to confuse the public regarding LGBT youth: they recently mailed their innocuously appearing yet truly virulent “Facts About Youth” to school superintendents across the country under the guise of medical expertise. Contrary to the cohesive opinion of numerous reputable medical and mental health organizations Dr Benton peddles the snake oil ideas that same-sex sexual attraction is learned, pathological and treatable.

This counterfeit group of fringe fanatics should not be confused with the renown American Academy of Pediatricians which in fact completely disagrees with the assertions, misrepresentations and frank lies being perpetuated by Dr Benton et al:

An estimated 2 to 5 percent of adolescents are homosexual, the same percentage as among adults. Scientists generally agree that several factors converge to form a person’s sexual orientation. But there is increasing evidence that human beings may be genetically predisposed toward heterosexuality or homosexuality. These tendencies may even be established prior to birth, just as gender, hair color and complexion are all preprogrammed. Contrary to what some believe, we do not choose to be straight or gay. Come adolescence, a person is innately drawn toward one sex or the other.” – American Academy of Pediatricians

For further reading about Dr Benton’s sleazy organization and its assertions I highly recommend the excellent 4/5/2010 Box Turtle Bulletin post by Timothy Kincaid: “Bogus ‘American College of Pediatricians’ distributes deliberately fraudulent anti-gay propaganda to schools.

CNN anchor Kyra Phillips is another perpetrator of misinformation. Under the guise of “balanced” reporting, Kyra recently interviewed Richard Cohen (right), an unlicensed “ex-gay therapist”, in her segment “Homosexuality -is it a problem in need of a cure?” As evident in the photo, one of the ways Cohen “cures” is by encouraging men to hold each other in semblance of father and child and thus address the supposed childhood trauma sustained from being raised by an emotionally-distant father. First asserted by Irving Bieber, MD in the 1960s as the cause of homosexuality, this hypothesis has long since been debunked but remains central dogma of the anti-gay fringe.

Quacks like Benton and Cohen will always exist but the pseudoscience they espouse should be recognized for what it is: snake oil “evidence” that only appear on the surface to support their baseless beliefs. They do not represent the other side of the coin nor the counterweight to a mass in balance. They are in fact nothing more than angry flies buzzing around a mountain of scientific evidence they would rather ignore.

The nation’s leading professional medical, health, and mental health organizations do not support efforts to change young people’s sexual orientation through therapy and have raised serious concerns about the potential harm from such efforts.” American Psychological Association

Related posts