Tag Archives: Politics & society

Political and social events in the news that involve LGBTQI and/or women’s issues.

Gay doctor? Why I’m out, loud and proud

IMG_1751

To this day I do not know a single LGBTQ* person from my youth. I was not privileged to have understanding parents nor to have role models with whom I could connect. Many youth today find themselves in a similar position.

Growing up as an LGBTQ* person is rarely easy. Rejection, isolation, discrimination, harassment and physical violence are all too common. Understandably this results in low self-esteem, risky self-destructive behaviors, homelessness and suicide. Hope for a better future is often an essential lifeline to those of us who are hurting. We need to know that suffering will end and that we can be happy.

I choose to be visible for this reason. As many others have said, I want you to know that life does get better. So much better!

If you are struggling please know that you are not alone. You are precious and you are loved. There are many resources available to you. All you need to do is reach out.

  • The Trevor Project (http://www.thetrevorproject.orgis a 24 hour help line that is available to anyone who needs a listening ear.
    • 866-4-U-TREVOR (866-488-7386)
  • Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (http://www.pflag.org) provides support and resources for families and friends of LGBT people.

We do NOT want to cut your beautiful baby boy!

IMG_5505Dear Dr Pate,

I’m a third-year medical student who is strongly considering going into OBGYN. Unfortunately, I’ve been really dismayed to discover how common it is for OBGYN residency programs to require their residents to perform circumcisions. I’ve begun to worry that my moral opposition to circumcision might be incompatible with going into OBGYN. I don’t want to get into a situation where I might be fired if I don’t perform circumcisions because I would rather get fired–and if that’s the case then why go into that field in the first place. I started to google about the topic and your blog was one of the first to come up.

Do you have any advice for a student in my situation? Should I try to seek out OBGYN residency programs that don’t require residents to circumcise? Should I just match into OBGYN and then refuse once I already have the job (can I be fired for that?).

Thanks,
MS3


Dear MS3,

Thanks for writing! I find it so refreshing to hear more and more from students, such as yourself, who desire to refrain from performing circumcision. Clearly you are not alone but tradition is deeply engrained in culture and deviation therefrom is considered illogical and threatening. If you are interested in OB/GYN, don’t worry about circumcisions. I wouldn’t even bother mentioning it in your interviews — it falls under the same legal protection as beliefs about abortion.

I encourage you to check out my post — Do medical students have to assist circumcisions? There are links to resources available to you. Hold you head high! Where there is a will there is a way. You don’t have to compromise yourself.

Some will tell you that refraining will limit your career opportunities. It is true that some jobs will try to push you. You can take either approach — put it out there so that potential problems will fall away before you become too invested or discuss it after the fact and assert your rights.

I chose to be proud and loud throughout my process; I stirred controversy and rocked the boat. This did result in expected consequences and more than a few blows to my ego however it was the right path for me. At least one attending physician and another resident refuse to do circumcisions because of my example. And that, for me, made the pain and suffering worth it.

And I have not been pushed aside by all employers as I was warned. One recruiter even told me that I didn’t have a chance landing a job in a major city. I dropped him like a rock. Instead I have joined a phenomenal group practice in a very coveted location just 20 minutes north of Manhattan.

So my advice to you is this: Follow the path that feels right for you and do not fear the obstacles that you will find. Be true to yourself and work hard and your path will continue to unfold before you. Keep your eyes on that path and drop the rocks!

Sincerely,
James Pate, MD
http://JamesPateMD.com

A Public Apology to My Circumcised Son

A Public Apology to My Circumcised Son is another post I came across while catching up on my break. It was posted 11/21/10 on Peachy Keen Birth Services.

“My Little Buster,” the distraught mother writes, “I’m so sorry. How else do I begin this?… As a parent, there will be a million things you will look back on and think ‘Gee… I wish I would have done that differently…’… But how in the hell do I apologize for having part of your genitals amputated for NO MEDICAL REASON? When you were less than 24 hours old!… So for all of the parenting moments I look back upon, wishing I could re-do, having you circumcised is the only one I have utter remorse for. With much, much love, Your Mommy.”

The post struck a cord in me because I too carry this burden, and I echo the sentiments of this mother.

When my son was born in 1998 — in my former life as a closeted, gay, married, mechanical engineer — my ex-wife and I had little discussion on the matter. I am circumcised, my father is circumcised and her father and brother are circumcised. Why wouldn’t we do to our son what was a norm for our family? We didn’t understand the risks. We didn’t understand the permanent damage that we were condoning. We did not understand the history of circumcision in the U.S. nor its root in puritanical aims to deter masturbation. We were simply uninformed and did not understand the gravity of our decision to circumcise our son.

Now it is too late. We stole that choice from him and his body is permanently altered. I have apologized to him. The tears ran down my cheeks. He has forgiven me but at his young age he cannot comprehend the consequences of that decision. Do not repeat our mistakes. Leave your sons whole as nature/god intended them to be. Allow them the autonomy over their bodies that is rightfully theirs alone. Let’s end this barbaric custom of infant genital mutilation!

– James Pate, MD

Who’s your “doctor”?

“When I see a bird that walks like a duck and swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, I call that bird a duck.”
James Whitcomb Riley (1849–1916)

As healthcare continues to evolve in the U.S., more and more “midlevel practitioners” are taking on roles formerly provided by physicians. Examples of midlevel practitioners include the physician assistant (PA), doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) and advanced practice registered nurses (APRN) such as the certified nurse midwife (CNM), nurse practitioner (NP), certified nurse anesthetist (CNRA) and doctor of nursing (RN, PhD). Some of these providers may be unintentionally called “doctor” or request that their patients refer to them as such, however it is very important to recognize that they are NOT equivalent to — or substitutes for — the traditional physicians of Western medicine.

What is a doctor?

According to Merriam-Webster, the word “doctor” literally means “teacher”. Given that around 700 years have past since its first use in the 14th century, its modern meaning includes both the academic doctor of philosophy (PhD) as well as the healing art doctors of medicine (MD), osteopathy (DO), podiatric medicine (DPM), dental surgery (DDS), chiropractic medicine (DC), naturopathic medicine (ND) and veterinary medicine (DVM).

What does it take to be a physician?

As delineated above, there are many paths to gaining the title but the training involved and the credentials earned are not equivalent. In Western Medicine there are only 2 types of physicians: the MD and the DO. While they arise from independent roots (allopathy vs osteopathy respectively), the training involved is essentially the same except for minor details that occur during medical school. To become a physician we all must take the same arduous path.

  • Pre-medical school
    • Completion of a Bachelor’s Degree – A 4+ year process in any field of study including the sciences (BS) as well as the arts (BA or BFA). A competitive GPA is generally felt to be 3.6 or higher.
    • Prerequisite course work – Must be completed in biology, chemistry, physics and math in addition to regular course work.
    • The Medical College Admission Test (MCAT)Administered by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), the MCAT “is a standardized, multiple-choice examination designed to assess the examinee’s problem solving, critical thinking, writing skills, and knowledge of science concepts and principles prerequisite to the study of medicine. Per the Princeton Review, it is a “5-1/2 hour, computer–based test that has the reputation of being one of the most challenging standardized tests.” Over the past 2 years (2010-2011) the average score has been 25 out of 48 possible points. A competitive score is generally felt to be 30 or higher and only around 1/3 of test-takers will achieve this score.
    • Other considerations – Competitive GPA and MCAT scores alone are not enough to ensure admittance to medical school. Other considerations include experiences in leadership, community service, medicine and research as well as letters of recommendation, your personal statement and of course how well you interview.
    • Chances – According to the American Medical Association, “For the 2010-2011 entering class, U.S. medical schools received 580,304 applications from 42,742 applicants, an average of 14 per applicant. There were also 31,834 first-time applicants—up 2.5 percent from 31,063 in 2009-2010.” The AMA also noted that, “American allopathic medical schools enrolled 18,390 first-year students for 2009” and “nearly 13,000 applicants competed for 5,100 available slots” in osteopathic medical schools. So given 23,490 total positions and 55,742 applicants, the chance of acceptance based on these numbers alone is 42%.
  • Medical school – Another 4+ year process for those fortunate enough to gain admittance. Medical school serves to form the foundation of medical knowledge that we build upon in residency. It costs an average of $30,000 per year for tuition alone; it does not include books, supplies and living expenses. Can you drink water from a fire-hose? That’s what it feels like being deluged with information, struggling to retain it and continuing to compete against peers. How well we do has a direct effect on our ability to obtain a residency position not only in a location of our choosing but also in the field of our choosing – surgical residencies (general surgery, OB/GYN, urology, etc) are more competitive than medical residencies (family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics, etc). In addition there are 2 more standardized tests we must complete — the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) steps 1 and 2 — that along with yet another personal statement, more letters of recommendation and interviews are evaluated for residency positions. We obtain either the MD or DO degree when we graduate from medical school depending on the program.
  • Residency – All residents are doctors given that we have completed 8+ years of higher education and have graduated with the degree from medical school. First year residents are commonly referred to as “interns”. Residency serves as a kind of apprenticeship or on-the-job-training and thus, in spite of our extensive education, we actually make less money than the nurses with whom we work. Residency can be as short as 3 years or greater than 5 years depending on the chosen specialty.
  • Fellowship – For those of us who want to sub-specialize, yet another level of training awaits (the fellowship) with its own process of evaluation and competition. Those of us who do not complete a fellowship are loosely referred to as “generalists” and those who do so are called “specialists”.

All in all to become a physician you are looking at a minimum of 11 years of rigorous higher education: a bachelor’s degree (4+ years), medical school (4+ years), residency (3+ years) and possible fellowship (1+ years). Now that we have explored what it means to be a physician of Western medicine, let’s discuss the process of becoming a midlevel practitioner.

Types of degrees

  • BA/BFA/BS – Bachelor of arts/fine arts/science (4+ years)
  • MA/MS – Master of arts/science (2+ years following a BA/BFA/BS)
  • PhD – Doctor of philosophy (4+ years following a BA/BFA/BS)

Physician extenders

  • Physician assistant (PA) – 6+ years (BA/BFA/BS plus MS in physician assistance).
  • Nurse practitioner (NP) – 6+ years (BS in nursing plus MS in nursing).
  • Certified nurse midwife (CNM) – 6+ years (BS in nursing plus MS in midwifery).
  • Certified nurse anesthetist (CNRA) – 6+ years (BS in nursing plus MS in nurse-anesthesia).
  • Doctor of nursing (RN, PhD) – 8+ years (BS in nursing plus PhD in nursing).
  • Doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) – 8+ years (BA/BFA/BS plus PhD in pharmacology).

Now I’m really not trying to dis on my fellow healthcare providers. In truth PAs, APRNs and PharmDs are needed to improve the accessibility of healthcare to citizens around the country. I am merely trying to point out that large differences remain between midlevel providers and physicians: their training is less comprehensive, less rigorous and certainly less competitive. To compare the two is to compare a Lexus with a Kia: both are cars but their builds are very different.

Why does this matter?

A recent data brief from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) arm of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) noted that over the past 8 years (periods 2000-2001 to 2008-2009):

  • Outpatient visits attended only by APRNs have increased by 50%
  • People that live outside of major cities are 6 times more likely to be seen by a midlevel practitioner
  • Midlevel practitioners are utilized heavily by general medicine (21%) and OB/GYN (19%) compared to pediatrics (8%) and general surgery (6%)

Summary

As we move forward in the improvement of healthcare delivery in the U.S., it is important that we don’t lose sight of quality as we push for quantity. Most aches and pains and even chronic conditions can be (and probably should be) managed by physician extenders, however under the supervision and guidance of the physicians from whom they extend. To permit the practice of medicine without the physician is egregious and frankly dangerous. The next time you see your “doctor”, make sure you understand what kind of “doctor” s/he is. If you are seeing a midlevel provider, inquire about the supervising physician and how s/he is involved in your care. If there is no physician involved I highly suggest that you find yourself a real “doctor” or be prepared for the increase in medical error that will inevitably come. And in response to Mr Riley, quoted above, I would caution: Beware the decoys! They have become quite sophisticated.

Talk To Me – Kevin McHale for The Trevor Project

Posted on YouTube 8/26/11 but still relevant:

During National Suicide Prevention Week (9/4/11 – 9/10/11), join Kevin McHale and The Trevor Project for “Talk To Me,” a campaign for conversation. Visit our website to learn how you can participate.

And remember: If you or someone you know ever needs help, please call The Trevor Lifeline at 866-488-7386. It’s free, confidential and available 24/7. Or visit http://www.TheTrevorProject.org.

.Related posts

 

Melvin Dwork: WWII vet goes from “undesirable” to “honorable”

Via the Washington Post, the Associated Press reports that World War II Navy veteran, Melvin Dwork, has finally won his decades long fight: changing his “undesirable” discharge for being gay to “honorable”. The change is more than saving face, “he will now be eligible for the benefits he had long been denied, including medical care and a military burial.” This decision is hopefully only the first of many given that over 100,000 soldiers have been discharged since WWII and robbed of their honor and military benefits simply for being gay. “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” officially dies tomorrow, 9/20/11.

The professional imperative for obstetrician-gynecologists to discontinue newborn male circumcision.

The professional imperative for obstetrician-gynecologists to discontinue newborn male circumcision.

Smith JF, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Medical College, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, USA
Am J Perinatol. 2011 Feb;28(2):125-8. Epub 2010 Aug 10.

Abstract

Newborn male circumcision has been practiced for millennia for a variety of medical, social, religious, and cultural reasons. Indications for routine circumcision remain controversial, with proponents and dissidents arguing their sides vigorously. Popular in the United States, it has persisted in the scope of practice of obstetrics and gynecology, a field specializing in the opposite gender. To excel in women’s reproductive health, we should no longer passively accept or actively maintain this procedure in our specialty. Steps are suggested to remove the residual and improper inclusion of circumcision from the scope of practice of obstetrics and gynecology.

Related posts

“Two Spirits” Documetary

http://youtu.be/lpKaP6-1Bus

“Two Spirits” is a documentary that uses the tragic story of the 2001 murder of a nádleehí teen, Fred Martinez, to explore the Navajo beliefs concerning gender. In contrast to the rigid binary gender roles perpetuated in Western culture, the Navajo tradition defines 4 gender roles: male, female, male with a feminine essence, and female with a masculine essence. TPT (Twin Cities Public Television) will be airing Lydia Nibley’s documentary, “Two Spirits” on the following dates and times:

  • Sunday, 6/19/11, 10:30pm (channels 2, 440, 802)
  • Monday, 6/20/11, 4:30am (channels 2, 440, 802)
  • Saturday, 6/25/11, 10:00pm (channel 13)
  • Sunday, 6/26/11, 4:00am (channel 13)

The Navajos are not alone in their recognition of a gender spectrum. Indeed many cultures throughout the world have made place for those of us who do not so neatly fit into one-size-fits-all gender roles. Click here or on the map below to explore them.

End genital mutilation now

Ever hear about genital mutilation? Well it happens every day to babies and children around the world including the USA. According to the 2011 US bill, the Genital Mutilation Prohibition Act submitted to the US Senate and House of Representatives, “genital mutilation” is defined as circumcision, excision, cutting or mutilation of “the whole or any part of the labia majora, labia minora, clitoris, vulva, breasts, nipples, foreskin, glans, testicles, penis, ambiguous genitalia, hermaphroditic genitalia, or genital organs of another person who has not attained the age of 18 years or on any nonconsenting adult.” In line with the 2003 UK Female Genital Mutilation Act that protects girls only, this bill has been written so that all minors may likewise be protected.

Individual communities are also starting to recognize the fact that genital mutilation of children, regardless of sex, is wrong and should be stopped. The Huffington Post, Los Angeles reports that “A proposal to ban the circumcision of male children in San Francisco has been cleared to appear on the November ballot, setting the stage for the nation’s first public vote on what has long been considered a private family matter.” Even a comic book, Foreskin Man, has been created to raise awareness of this long accepted gross violation of the human rights of personal autonomy and self preservation. A pdf of the comic’s first issue can be found here or by clicking on the image above. Unfortunately, the second issue is considered by many to be anti-Semitic, which I do NOT endorse nor desire to be associated with, so I have not provided any other links.

Removing body parts without medical indication and without the consent of the person receiving it is tragic and should be criminalized. This is especially true of the sex organs given that at best, surgery permanently alters cosmetic appearance, sensitivity and sexual function. At worst, surgery can result in horrific disfiguration and/or death. Given these risks I strongly believe that non-medically indicated circumcision should be banned for all minors. Adults who choose to be circumcised for religious or other reasons, such as Jews and Muslims, can surgically alter their bodies after they have reached the age of consent.

David Reimer is one such infant victim whose penis was destroyed by circumcision in 1966. Following the medical advise of Dr John Money, a prominent psychologist and sexologist of the time, David’s parents elected for him to undergo sex reassignment surgery to raise him as a girl. Unfortunately, David never accepted his forced female gender role and began living as a male at the age of 15. He continued to suffer years of severe depression, financial instability, a dissolving marriage and eventually committed suicide in 2005. His tragic story is catalogued in the bestseller biography: “As Nature Made Him: The Boy Who Was Raised as a Girl” by John Colapinto.

Horrific medical complications of male circumcision are NOT a thing of the past. Review of peer reviewed medical journals reveals that present day complications continue to include poor cosmetic outcomes; excessive bleeding; necrosis of the penis and/or surrounding structures; lymphedema; keloid scar formation; skin bridges; buried penis; urethral stenosis, obstruction or fistula; penis shortening; decreased sensation; partial or complete destruction of the penis, amputation and death.

Doctors too should be wary of offering this “service”. Not only are surgical “mishaps” a legal liability but even culturally acceptable outcomes incur an ever increasing risk of malpractice accusation and lawsuit.

In conclusion, it is high time that we recognize infant male circumcision for what it is: a far-too-long accepted tradition of male genital mutilation. All infants and children deserve better than this. Click on one of the banners below to learn more and to find out how you too can help protect children and end genital mutilation now.






Related posts

Norrie: sex not specified

When a baby is born the first question people usually ask is, “Is it a boy or a girl?” Yet many babies are not so easily classified. Some babies have genitals that have both male and female features. Others may appear to be girls only to discover as teenagers that the reason that they are not menstruating is because the have testicles instead of ovaries. Similarly apparent boys may have ovaries and there are others who have a mixture of both.

Some people’s brains do not match their bodies; there are numerous accounts of children and adults who feel this way. Although the American Psychiatric Association (APA) labels these people with the diagnosis of Gender Identity Disorder (GID), it is the only “mental disorder” that is treated medically (with hormones and surgery) instead of with psychiatric medications. And evidence continues to mount that the brains of these individuals are both structurally and functionally similar to the brains of the gender they claim to be. In Westernized countries we label these people “transsexual” or “transgender”. Other cultures make room for a third sex and use other labels: “Hijra” (India), “Fa’afafine” (Polynesia), “Kathoeys” (Thailand) and “Two-Spirit” (Native American Tribes) are well-known examples.

In the distant past rigid gender roles may have been useful to delineate the expectations and responsibilities of individuals and to maintain order within their collective communities. On the other hand these gendered roles also created power differentials that have been used to disempower, subjugate and abuse women for millenia.

The roles of women in American society have undergone radical changes. During WWII, a shortage of male factory workers gave women an opportunity to leave the home and made Rosie the Riveter a cultural icon. When the men returned from war women were encouraged to return to the home by the promotion of the idealized homemaker exemplified by June Cleaver of the TV show “Leave It to Beaver”. While many women did return home many did not. Given that women continue to make less money than men for similar work and that they remain outnumbered in leadership roles today it is clear that inequality of the sexes is alive and well in modern society.

But what about all the individuals who do not neatly fit into these cultural boxes? A video interview with Norrie of Sidney, Australia by abc NEWS shows that Norrie is one such person who defies definitions and prefers the box “sex not specified”. The interview subtly suggests that if gender is really a continuum then perhaps we should reconsider the purpose that gender identification serves and consider its worth in context of the inequality that it propagates.